BRON — reviewer protocol and score sheet
Protocol only. No participant results or performance claims.

Purpose: evaluate one supported assignment, including the attorney’s review.
Use public or fictional material until appropriate data-handling terms are agreed.

Before the assignment:
- Record the source bundle, source versions and expected result.
- Have a practicing litigator establish the issues, known gaps and review criteria.
- Record participant background, tools, permitted assistance and task familiarity.
- Use equivalent tasks or counterbalance order to reduce learning effects.
- Agree participant consent and how results may be reported.

For each run, record:
Participant code:
Date / product revision:
Assignment and source-bundle revision:
Condition / task order:
Preparation time (minutes):
Attorney review time (minutes):
Total time (minutes):
Source references checked:
Unsupported statements / incorrect quotations:
Material issues missed:
Corrections required:
Unresolved questions correctly retained:
Expected deliverable received:
Reviewer notes and supporting source locations:

Reporting:
- Include every completed run and disclose exclusions, failures and missing data.
- Separate preparation time from review time and report total time.
- Publish task definitions, sample size, methods and limitations with observations.
- Obtain permission before quoting a participant or identifying a firm.
- Do not treat a controlled result as a guarantee for another matter.