Skip to content
Litigation.Held together.
Request a demo
← All features

Drafting and citations

Every sentence, back to its source.

Draft from the matter's record, and open the passage behind any sentence. Before a document leaves, each citation is checked. One that cannot be confirmed holds it.

Availability: Available

Request a demoSee an example ↓
BRONDrafting and citationsNorth Harbor · notice memorandum v4
Notice memorandum v4Release check

Before it leaves the firm.

BRON checks each citation and quotation against its source. One it cannot confirm holds the document for an attorney.

Still to reviewThe May 2 email does not show when Smith received it.
Inspect the review checks
Garcia Dep. 118:4–12 located in the transcript
Smith Dep. 44:12–20 located in the transcript
May 2 email located. It does not show when Smith received it
Approved by Elena Rivera, April 30, 2026
About this example
Illustration · fictional matterThe names, dates and documents are invented for this example.

In practice

From evidence to a version you can sign.

  1. Build from the matter.

    Draft section by section from the facts on the matter. BRON records which facts each draft relied on.

    BRON / Documents01

    Notice / source basis

    Timing is disputed

    Two accounts

    Garcia Dep. 118:4–12
    Smith Dep. 44:12–20

    Notice memorandum · v4

    Garcia testified that the supplier knew of the defect before May 4, 2025. Smith testified that it knew only after that date. On May 2, 2025, Garcia emailed Smith the defect report. The email does not show when Smith received or read it.

    Replaces v3, held for review. Both accounts. Written before the email arrived.

    Prepared by Alex ChenApril 30, 2026
    North Harbor · Notice of defect · Illustration · fictional matter

  2. Check what it rests on.

    Click a sentence to open the passage it cites. Whether the passage supports the sentence is your call.

    BRON / Documents02

    Notice memorandum / inspect its basis

    The paragraph, and the testimony behind it.

    The draft attributes each account to the witness who gave it.

    Garcia deposition · 118:4–12

    “Before May 4.”

    The supplier knew of the defect before May 4. Garcia attended the review meeting.

    Smith deposition · 44:12–20

    “Only after May 4.”

    The supplier knew of the defect only after May 4. Smith relies on correspondence he reviewed.

    The passage shows what the paragraph cites. Whether it supports the paragraph is a separate question.

    North Harbor · Notice of defect · Illustration · fictional matter

  3. Approve the version that leaves.

    An approval covers one version. Edit it afterward, and the new version needs its own review.

    BRON / Documents03

    Notice memorandum · v4

    Approved by Elena Rivera

    The approval belongs to this version.

    Approved
    v4, April 30, 2026. Alex Chen prepared it.
    Held
    v3, held for review
    If v4 is edited
    The new version needs its own review

    Before it leaves

    BRON checks the citations again. A document it holds can be released only by a licensed attorney at the firm, with a recorded reason.

    A revised draft needs checks against its own version.
    North Harbor · Notice of defect · Illustration · fictional matter

What this carries into the rest of the matter

  • Each sentence's sources, into review and later revisions.
  • The facts each draft relied on, so a corrected fact flags the draft.
  • Citation results, into the release check.
  • The approved version, into the record and any export.

One decision in practice

Does the passage state both accounts fairly?

DRAFT / COUNSEL REVIEW

Garcia places notice before May 4.

Smith's account puts it after that date.

Your next decision

Choose the wording the record supports. Opening a source shows where the sentence points. It does not confirm the sentence.

How it works, in detailSee every feature

Ask us to show a held citation, and who can release it.

Request a demo