Evaluating BRON

The assignment

Choose a disputed fact, a memorandum or a discovery assignment. Name the sources, expected result, reviewer and limits. We first show a supported assignment on the public sample.

Account and workspace access

Choose a date and available time on BRON, add your contact details and verify your email with a code. No BRON account is required. A meeting is booked only after the calendar confirms it and BRON shows a receipt. Afterwards, you may create an account and confirm your email to explore the sample while firm access is reviewed. Firm work begins after approval and provisioning.

Some capabilities have limited availability or are in development. Confirm the specific assignment and connections in writing.

Setup responsibilities

Agree what BRON handles, what stays in existing tools, what material is needed and who sets up each connection. A lawyer reviews the result against its sources. The team decides whether to expand.

Data handling and review

Read the security information and sub-processor list. Confirm roles, sharing and approval requirements before adding your firm’s material. Send public information only through homepage chat and meeting forms.

Commercial terms

BRON does not publish a rate card. Arranging a meeting does not commit your firm to a price or pilot. Agree commercial and data-handling terms before adding client material.

Evaluation measures

Compare a known assignment’s expected result with the work prepared. Record preparation time, review time, corrections, missed issues and unresolved questions. Keep reviewer observations with the source material.

No measured results from a practicing-litigator study are published here. The kit below is a protocol for collecting evidence.